Samsung Galaxy Camera GC100 Reviews

Samsung Galaxy Camera Review at Engadget

This is a tricky thing to evaluate. On the one hand, if we had $500 to spend on a camera of this size, we'd be more likely to spend it on a sophisticated mirrorless model that delivers better image quality. Alternatively, if we needed a cheap compact, we might opt for the Samsung WB850F, which has WiFi connectivity and the same lens and sensor as the Galaxy Camera, but costs half the price. The fact that we're paying so much money to dupe expensive components already used in smartphones, and that we'd have to spend at least $10 per month extra to get a basic data plan and make use of that SIM slot, all weighs heavily against the Galaxy Camera as a practical purchase. Read more...

Samsung Galaxy Camera Review at T3

While we were initially skeptical about the need for an Android-based camera, we were impressed with the Samsung Galaxy Camera. We particularly liked the snapper's physical design as well as the large, HD screen. We looking forward to testing the camera out in the wild. Read more...

Samsung Galaxy Camera Review at CNET

The best way for me to sum up the Samsung Galaxy Camera is that it's an OK camera, but a very good gadget. The lens and image sensor are nothing special and if you just want a compact megazoom with some wireless features, I recommend the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V or the Samsung WB850F, or just buy another camera and use an Eye-Fi SD card. With those, you can shoot whatever you want, and then wirelessly send the images to a mobile device and use that to upload. The Galaxy's advantage is that it's all in one; you shoot and you share, just like you would with a smartphone or tablet with a mobile data plan. The price for the privilege of doing that, though, is too much. Read more...